Alert: Answers to questions may appear
in parenthesis.
Let's
look at a sample student data table. It appears that for
the first 5 examples the rule "add length and width and you get the
number of touches" seems to work. So why the surprise in example 6?
(Hmm..)
|
W
|
L
|
Touches
|
|
5
|
7
|
12
|
|
8
|
3
|
11
|
|
5
|
4
|
9
|
|
10
|
13
|
23
|
|
5
|
9
|
14
|
|
6
|
9
|
5 (surprise!)
|
Why did it come up 5 and not 15?
Let's look at the path for the 6
by 9 table.

Here are two other paths that
also have 5
"touches":
4 by 6 table

2 by 3 table

(Answer coming up.) Note that
for the smallest of
the three tables
the "adding the length and width rule" once again works. The tables
have
the same path because they are geomtetrically similar which means that
their sides are in proportion to each other. Another way of thinking
about
this is that the ratios of the dimensions are all equal. So if the
dimensions
are relatively prime, the path will traverse every square and the
number
of touches will be the sum. Otherwise, find the the smallest rectangle
that will have the same path. The sum of its dimensions will give you
the number of touches. So the additive rule does work - directly if the
length and width are relatively prime - and if they are not then
"reduce" the numbers to the smallest possible equivilent table and then
add!
Part B - Finding which
corner the
ball ends up in also has to do with "reduced form" rectangles. Similar
paths
will always end up in the same corner. So the investigation should be
done
with paths of relatively prime dimensions.
|
W
|
L
|
Touches
|
Corner?
|
|
5
|
7
|
12
|
Top
Right (UR) |
|
8
|
3
|
11
|
Top
Left (TL) |
|
5
|
4
|
9
|
Bottom
Right (BR) |
|
10
|
13
|
23
|
Top
Left (TL) |
|
5
|
9
|
14
|
Top
Right (UR) |
|
6
|
9
|
5
|
Top
Left (TL)* |
|
7
|
10
|
17
|
Bottom
Right (BR) |
Note that the two odd,
relatively prime dimensions
both end up in the upper right or opposite corner. If the width is even
and the length is odd and they are relatively prime, the width
"dominates"
and the ball ends up in the Top Left corner. If the opposite is true,
then the length dominates and the ball ends up in the Bottom Right
corner. Does this always work? (Ahuh.)
If the dimensions are even,
which corner
will welcome the ball? (It could wind up in any of the three corners.
Two
even numbers are NOT relatively prime.)
Why can't the ball return to
the Bottom Left
corner?
Does switching length and
width numbers change
the final destination? For example, does the ball end up in the same
corner
for a 7 by 5 table as a 5 by 7 table? (Looks like they do. In both
cases the ball starts in pocket A and ends up in pocket C.)
 
*Use the
"reduced" 2 by 3 table.
Other Resources
See NCTM's
Illumination activity Paper Pool at
http://illuminations.nctm.org/LessonDetail.aspx?ID=L419
Student's
Page
|